Charles I, anointed King of England and Scotland, stood at the scaffold at Whitehall. Although it was January, he didn’t shiver, wearing a double layer of clothing so that the crowd would not perceive any trembling from the wintry cold as fear. Before kneeling to place his head on the wooden block, he is said to have uttered, ‘I go from a corruptible to an incorruptible crown, where no disturbance can be, no disturbance in the world’, referring to the Civil War which in 1649 claimed his life. But there is another, more cryptic last word, a parting shot, that he uttered to his minister standing alongside him. The weary king, passing his medal of St George to William Juxon, Bishop of London, spoke the single word, ‘Remember’. Kneeling, his head was severed from his neck with an axe, and the monarchy's rule, which had existed for more than a thousand years, came to a bloody end.
![]() |
Charles I, Metropolitan Museum, Public Domain |
But what did Charles mean? He may have been referring to the solemnity of the event – a nation beheading its rightful king on charges of treason and for inciting war and dissension in the realm. It was unprecedented. Queens had been executed on the scaffold, two on charges of adultery and two for treason, but up until 1649 no king had suffered in this way. Alternatively, Charles may have been bidding a last goodbye, telling Juxon to remember this moment and any consequences that might follow. Charles was a stubborn and righteous king, who believed he ruled via Divine Right granted to him only by God. Answerable only to Him, the king angered his subjects and triggered increasingly hostile sanctions from Parliament. It is entirely logical that Charles considered his legal murder an affront to God, and believed that divine punishment would follow.
By the end of the seventeenth century though, there was another explanation. The writer John Aubrey, who was twenty-three years of age at the time of Charles’ death, claimed that the king predicted that his son would come to the throne despite the Civil War’s abolishment of the monarchy and his own death sentence. ‘After King Charles the First was condemned’, wrote Aubrey, ‘he did tell Colonel Tomlinson that he 'believed the English Monarchy was now at an end.' About half an hour after, with a radiant countenance, and as if with a preternaturally assured manner, he affirmed to the Colonel, positively, that his son should reign after him. This information I had from Fabian Phillips, Esq., of the Inner Temple, who had the best authority for the truth of it.’ Was Juxon supposed to remember the occasion's futility, Charles believing that the monarchy would be once again restored under his son Charles II, which happened in 1660?
A spooky prediction or significance given by Aubrey and others long after the event? What do you think?
Liked this? You might also like 7 Historic Events That Happened in Hampton Court and Elizabeth Dormer, the Tragic Countess of Carnarvon.