Love British History

by Jo Romero

Tudor Power Couples

Forgotten Women of History

Forgotten Women of History

Historic Recipes

Historic Recipes

Wars of the Roses

Wars of the Roses

Power Couples of History

Power Couples of History

Reading, Berkshire

About Me & Press

About Me & Press

SUBSCRIBE

Subscribe to my Newsletter


Mary I was a formidable power in mid-sixteenth century England. Married to Philip of Spain, she fused the Tudor dynasty to that of the Habsburgs, arguably the most powerful family in Europe. She was England's first queen regnant, ruling in her own right, with her husband serving as consort. Their union boasted military, political and financial power and triggered crucial debates over a woman's power as a ruler in sixteenth century England. 


Mary was hard-working, decisive and had a clear image of the England she wanted to establish. She could be brutal, ordering the executions of those who rebelled, resisted or refused to follow her rules on power or religion. Very much her father's daughter, she also demonstrated the tenacity and determinedness of her mother, Katherine of Aragon. But what was it like to meet her? 


Luckily, the Venetian ambassador Giacomo Sorranzo met Mary in 1554 and left a detailed description of this formidable queen. At the time of their meeting she was thirty-eight years old and had been crowned the year before. Here's what he wrote.  


Princess Mary, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Public Domain


 "The most serene Madam Mary is entitled Queen of England and of France, and Defenderess of the Faith. She was born on the 18 February 1515 [1516], so she yesterday completed her thirty-eighth year, and six months. She is of low stature with a red and white complexion, and very thin. Her eyes are white and large, and her hair reddish; her face is round, with a nose rather low and wide, and were not her age on the decline, she might be called handsome rather than the contrary. She is not of a strong constitution, and of late she suffers from headache, and serious affection of the heart, so that she is often obliged to take medicine, and also to be blooded. She is of very spare diet, and never eats till one or two p.m., although she rises at daybreak, when after saying her prayers, and hearing Mass in private, she transacts business incessantly until after midnight, when she retires to rest; for she chooses to give audience not only to all the members of her Privy Council, and to hear from them every detail of public business, but also to all other persons who ask it of her. 

 

Her Majesty's countenance indicates great benignity and clemency, which are not belied by her conduct, for although she has had many enemies, and though so many of them were by law condemned to death, yet had the executions depended solely on her Majesty's will, not one of them perhaps would have been enforced; but deferring to her Council in everything, she in this matter likewise complied with the wishes of others, rather than with her own. She is endowed with excellent ability, and more than moderately read in Latin literature, especially with regard to Holy Writ; and besides her native tongue, she speaks Latin, French and Spanish, and understands Italian perfectly, but does not speak it. She is also very generous, but not to the extent of letting it appear that she rests her chief claim to commendation on this quality. She is so confirmed in the Catholic religion, that although the King her brother, and his Council, prohibited her from having the Mass celebrated according to the Roman Catholic ritual, she nevertheless had it performed in secret, nor did she ever choose by any act to assent to any other form of religion, her belief in that in which she was born being so strong, that had the opportunity offered, she would have displayed it at the stake, her hope being in God alone, so that she constantly exclaims, 'In te Domine confido, non confundar in eternam! Si Deus est pro nobis, quis contra nos?' ['In you, Lord, I trust; let me not be put to shame forever! If God is for us, who can be against us?']. 

 

Her Majesty takes pleasure in playing on the lute and spinet, and is a very good performer on both instruments, and indeed before her accession, she taught many of her maids of honour. But she seems to delight above all in arraying herself elegantly and magnificently, and her garments are of two sorts; the one a gown such as men wear, but fitting very close, with an under petticoat which has a very long train; and this is her ordinary costume, being also that of the gentlewomen of England. The other garment is a gown and bodice with wide hanging sleeves in the French fashion, which she wears on State occasions, and she also wears much embroidery, and gowns and mantles of cloth of gold, and cloth of silver of great value, and changes every day. She also makes great use of jewels, wearing them both on her chaperon, and round her neck, and as trimming for her gowns, in which jewels she delights greatly, and although she has a great plenty of them left her by her predecessors, yet were she better supplied with money than she is, she would doubtless buy more."


This account is in contrast with a lot of modern misconceptions about Mary. She is often depicted in period dramas and caricature as short and overweight, but was actually thin. Her medical problems are documented in other sources, which also refer to her sparse appetite. The 'Bloody Mary' of legend, according to Sorranzo after their meeting, regretted the executions of her enemies, who were only murdered under the advice of her council, presumably needing to set a precedent to prevent future rebellion. It is also possible that she felt the same way about the religious discord and many that were burned for their religion during her reign. Anna Whitelock, in her book Mary Tudor: England's First Queen, has also wondered whether Mary considered her laws to be so horrific that no one would resist them, and was surprised when subjects continued to practice Protestantism and meet death at the stake. I do think that if we could meet Mary we would find a woman quite unlike the caricature of her in many history books today. She was generous, patient, loved jewels and fine clothing and was resolute in her following of the Catholic religion. Fluent in languages, she was busy and worked hard, but made time for any that wanted to speak to her personally. By the time she reached the throne she had overcome a huge amount of adversity, managing a difficult relationship with her father, experiencing the decline and death of her mother, a succession of stepmothers and being called illegitimate after the annulment of her parents' marriage. She overcame resistance to her rule and openly rallied her troops at a rebellion, standing defiantly to marry the man she believed could provide England with power, military resources and an heir. Sadly, she was never to bear a child, and the throne passed to her half-sister Elizabeth I. One thing is for certain: Mary was a three-dimensional character and far more complex than the stake-wielding 'Bloody Mary' of legend.


Liked this? You might also like Richard and Elizabeth Cholmely of the Tower of London, Exploring Tudor Power Couple's Contributions to History and Why was Henry VIII Obsessed with Producing a Male Heir? 


Interested in Tudor history? You might also like my second book, Power Couples of the Tudor Era, published by Pen and Sword Books, which explores the contributions couples made to their own times as well as how they influenced our own. Mary is examined in detail in the context of her marriage to Philip of Spain and the ways in which they changed Tudor history. Elizabeth I and Robert Dudley Earl of Leicester, Bess of Hardwick and George Talbot and Henry VIII and Katherine of Aragon are among others explored in depth. Order your copy here. 


Sources and further reading

Stone, J.M. The History of Mary I, Queen of England as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors in original, private letters and other contemporary documents. Sands and Co, London. 1901. 
Whitelock, Anna. Mary Tudor, England's First Queen. Bloomsbury, London. 2010..

 


Every now and then you uncover a source which propels you back into history, showing its brutal nature, in a first-hand account related by someone who lived through it. Just recently I found one of these, in the story of Silas Told, who served as an apprentice on ships sailing between England and the Caribbean in the 1700s. Spoiler: it was not all about singing sea shanties and swigging rum.

A Ship at Sea, Ludolf Backhuysen 1650-1708, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Public Domain

Aged around thirteen, Silas was appointed to serve on Captain Moses Lilly's ship The Prince of Wales in 1725. In July of that year, Told and Lilly's crew sailed from Bristol to Cork in Ireland and then to Jamaica. Told's account, given in his An Account of the Life and Dealings With God published in 1786, makes uncomfortable reading for us today. There are regular references to slaves onboard, with Told later responsible for organising them onto the ship. He suffered beatings, too. On one occasion the chief mate called for the cabin boy, but not finding him, told Silas to fetch him a plate of food. Not having had experience on a ship before, Silas misunderstood the command, believing he had been told to go and get food to eat for himself. He 'got a plateful, carried it and ate it in the cabin.' When the chief mate realised Silas had eaten his food he 'knocked me down and began cursing and damning me at a horrible rate'.

He also suffered with sea sickness, a lack of provisions onboard and illness. When food and fresh water was available it was 'full of mud and maggots', wrote Silas. They also encountered rats on various voyages and ships. One sailor, anchored in Blue Fields Bay in Jamaica, was so thirsty that on finding water he 'fell flat upon his belly and drank so immoderately that a few hours after he came on board he expired'. Whenever crew members died onboard the ship, they were sewn up in a hammock and thrown overboard. Silas reacted with horror when on one occasion a 'large shark descended after him [the deceased person] and we suppose, swallowed the whole body'.

Hurricanes and voyaging also took their toll on the ship, which had to be constantly maintained, or in the worst case, abandoned altogether. At the Bay of Campeachy in the Spanish West Indies, Silas remembered the ship laying at anchor 'twelve miles from land, where with her bottom beating the ground every swell of the sea, she was exceedingly damaged'. At Kingston Harbour in Jamaica, the crew suffered a hurricane which started at 8pm in the evening and continued relentlessly until 6am the following morning. The devastation was clear when they gingerly emerged from their cabins that morning. Coconut trees had been torn up by their roots, 75 vessels in the harbour were destroyed and the shoreline was littered with bodies. 

During one bout of illness, which Silas blamed on the effects of the hurricane, he believed himself to be near death, having had a fever which lasted eleven months. He was nursed back to health by a black native 'who brought me every day a dose of jesuits bark to the warehouse, where I was laid in a hammock.' Silas relates his gratitude for the man's care, eventually recovering enough to be taken to a public house in the bay run by a Mrs Hutchinson, who was paid 40 shillings a week by Captain Lilly for Silas' board. Unable to work, and Captain Lilly heading back to England, Silas later came across another seafarer, Captain David Jones, for his next service.

Jones offered Silas a role on his ship, bound for England. From Bristol, Silas then sailed with Jones to Bermuda. Soon afterwards Silas had another opportunity and this time sailed under the command of Captain Timothy Tucker on the Royal George. He wrote that Tucker was a villain, and violent with the crew and women. He also accuses him of engaging in human trafficking. Tucker, says Silas, sold a woman to the Black Prince of Bonny on the African coast, and once accused Silas of taking more bread from the kitchen than his rations permitted. Silas tried to tell him that he was fetching provisions for the crew, but Tucker whipped him so hard that the crew told him that they could see bone through the remaining flesh on his back. During his voyages on the Royal George, Silas witnessed Tucker relentlessly bullying the crew and threatening the slaves onboard with loaded pistols. After Tucker's deplorable actions resulted in the death of one of the slaves, the others rebelled and tried to kill the rest of the crew. The captain, once he reached the island of Barbados, then tried to pacify them with 'large quantities of rum and sugar'. Unsurprisingly, Silas soon found himself on board another ship, in the service of Captain Roach, who was poisoned by a man named Tom Ancora after the men had a disagreement over a woman, another slave Roach had purchased and kept onboard. The Captain died on his ship, where he was sewn up in his hammock. Like so many sailors of the time, he was then 'committed to the great deep'. 

Attacks from pirate ships were also common, and Silas experienced a frightening episode when they were boarded by Spanish pirates. The pirate ship, he wrote, was 'exceedingly large, full of guns and men'. Despite the captain trying to save the ship, the men were reluctant to fight and so he announced a surrender, considering it his best chance of saving the crew. On boarding, the pirates took everything including the ship's tools and working compasses along with the clothes on the crew's backs. They kept the captain captive and told the crew that they would all be hanged at 8am the following morning. Luckily though, a gold watch had been stashed in a pile of coals. It was retrieved by Silas and used to barter the pirates off the ship. The two captains then came to a truce and were told by the Spanish to sail away out of the waters, and towards England. After years of beatings, difficult conditions and undertaking questionable duties, Silas Told ended his sea career in 1736, and became a preacher, offering support and spiritual guidance to those in gaol or awaiting execution. 

Reports like Silas' are valuable in that they give us a no holds barred representation of what life was like on an eighteenth-century ship. Told had no reason to lie - he looked back at his early years serving on ships as traumatic but personally formative. There were beatings, debilitating bouts of disease and life-threatening weather systems that took their toll on the crew and captain. Watching crew members fall ill and then be sewn into hammocks and carelessly dropped over the side of the deck must have been difficult to watch, as well as the brutal treatment dished out by tyrannic power-hungry captains towards crew members and the slaves onboard. It is possible to see that Told struggled with his conscience when carrying out duties relating to slaves; he writes of them fondly, remembering each of them as individuals and has compassion for their fate. He also shows gratitude for the man in Jamaica who nursed him back to health. He was an apprentice and a lower-status crew member, and followed orders from the captains he served under. However, this by no means diminishes his responsibility for the slave men and women that were on board. Not only recruited for their labour, Silas tells us of the slave woman brought onboard for companionship and likely sexual services for the captain. Instead of shying away from these stories, it is important to share them so that we can learn from the mistakes and errors of those in the past and work to make sure history is not repeated. It is interesting that after all these experiences Silas chose to follow a career as a preacher, providing support and spiritual assistance to those in trouble or condemned to die. His choosing to retell the story of his actions at sea in the context of his chosen career suggest that the suffering and trauma he saw in his earlier years may have triggered his move towards a more compassionate job in the community, as he turned away from hate and violence.

You might also like The Death and Burial of George II, LGBTQ Georgian Britain: Mary East, and Mary Edmonson, Accused Georgian Murderess.

Never want to miss a post? Subscribe to my newsletter here: 


Source:

An Account of the Life and Dealings of God with Silas Told, Late Preacher of the Gospel, Gilbert and Plummer, London. 1786 




We all know the character of Fagin from Oliver - who recruits young men and women to go out into London and pickpocket valuables from unsuspecting members of the public. But did you know that there was a real-life Fagan that ran a 'cut-purse school' in Elizabethan London? 

In the summer of 1585, while Elizabeth I ruled England, officials ventured into the city's streets and taverns to seize 'masterless men and cutpurses, whose practice was to rob Gentlemen's chambers, and Artificiers shops in and about London'. Focusing on the areas of Southwark and Westminster, they captured and interrogated a number of thieves and not only obtained 45 names of offenders in the same business but the identity of a man that was teaching and grooming many of them in their trade: Mr Wotton. 

Thomas Rowlandson, 1756–1827, Billingsgate Market, 1808.
Yale Center for British Art, Public Domain.

Wotton is described as a 'gentleman born', and so was of some financial means and status by birth. He was once a successful merchant, but somehow lost his income, opening an alehouse at Smarts Key near Billingsgate, just west from Tower Hill near the Thames. It was while managing this premises that Wotton turned to a life of crime, using the building as a 'school-house set up to learn young boys to cut purses'. 

Wotton's set up is described in a letter from the Recorder of London, Fleetwood, to Lord Burghley, informing him of the unfolding events. It gives us incredible detail as to how a cutpurse was taught and how they practiced being able to remove purses from men and women without them realising. Purses were suspended by a piece of leather or cord and attached to the person's clothing, so cash was easily reached while they were shopping. However this also meant that it was accessible to someone who was light-fingered with a sharp blade. Wotton set up an induction test, which determined whether a thief could work for him as a cutpurse or as the more intimate and risky pick-pocket. It went like this: 

"There were hung up two devices, the one was a pocket, the other was a purse. The pocket had in it certain counters and was hung about with hawk's bells, and over the top did hang a little sacring bell; and he that could take out a counter without any noise, was allowed to be a public foister. And he that could take a piece of silver out of the purse without the noise of any of the bells, he was adjudged a judicial nypper. Note that a foister is a pick-pocket, and a nypper is termed a pick-purse, or a cutpurse."

Wotton was not the only cut-purse teacher in London. Fleetwood's letter of 7 July 1585 ends with a list of offenders and their 'harbouring houses... such as live by theft'. They included Richard Waterward at the Falcon in Grace Street, the owner of the Bear and Ragged Staff at Charing, and that of the Black Lion in Shoreditch. There were others at Westminster, Southwark, Newington Butts and Turnmill Street, showing that there was indeed organised crime of this description in Tudor London. They even had their own language, so that they could discuss different types of theft without being discovered. 'Nyppe', as we have seen, was to cut a purse, while to 'lyfte' was to rob a shop or gentleman's chamber. We still use the word 'shoplift' today to describe a theft from a shop. Other words used included 'shave', which meant to steal an item like a cloak, sword or silver spoon and 'mylken ken' was to rob a home in the night while the residents were sleeping or out.

It is fascinating too to discover the names of some of those that were apprehended in the warm July of 1585 by Fleetwood and his officials. He names John Blewate, by trade a locksmith and Thomas Croe, a barber. Many of the other names don't mention an occupation, and they may have been unemployed, turning to crime to survive. Another man was known by his nickname, 'Welche Dyck', as well as the compelling and slightly unsettling 'Staringe Robin'. There are no women's names in the list.

The idea of a gang of instructors teaching boys and men to steal items from people, their businesses, homes and chambers and bring back their valuables is set in legend, thanks to the Oliver Twist novel by Charles Dickens. But, judging from the account sent to Lord Burghley it was a common occurrence in sixteenth century Tudor London too.

Liked this? You might also like Richard and Elizabeth Cholmely of the Tower of London, Exploring Tudor Power Couple's Contributions to History and Why was Henry VIII Obsessed with Producing a Male Heir? 

Interested in Tudor history? You might also like my second book, Power Couples of the Tudor Era, published by Pen and Sword Books, which explores the contributions couples made to their own times as well as how they influenced our own. Elizabeth I and Robert Dudley Earl of Leicester are one of the duos explored in depth. Order your copy here. 



Never want to miss a post? Subscribe to my newsletter here: 



Source:

Henry Ellis, Original Letters, Illustrative of English History, Volume 2, London. 1825, p295-303 


John Flamsteed was born in Denby in Derbyshire on the evening of 19 August 1646. Brought up by his father following the death of his mother when he was three years old, he became an enthusiastic reader from a young age. Starting off with romances, he moved on to histories and tragedies and began to absorb even more of the world around him, reading geography and classical books. At the age of 14, when his school friends made their next step to university, John became ill, and his father thought it best not to send him. During this time he managed to get hold of a copy of Sacrobosco's De Sphcera, a mathematical work written in Latin. Naturally curious about the night sky and encouraged by his father, John watched the stars and applied everything he had learned up to that point in attempting to understand the growing academic discipline of astronomy. 

 

John Flamsteed, Wellcome Collection. Public Domain


Gradually, he made links with other like-minded men, such as George Linacre and William Litchford. In 1665 a comet raced above London, and Charles II and his queen Catherine of Braganza stayed up to watch it. Samuel Pepys tried to see it too but grumbled that he could see only cloud. But Flamsteed in Derbyshire was watching too. He soon calculated timings of the year, the distance of the Earth from the Sun and catalogued 70 different stars. In his first paper for the Royal Society, established by Charles II on his accession, he apologised in advance for his ‘juvenile heat’ and published it under an alias. The Society loved it so much that they tracked him down and praised his work, Flamsteed travelling to London, where he was gifted a micrometer and ordered some telescope lenses. 

 

Flamsteed was quickly noticed by other eminent scientists of the era, such as Sir Isaac Newton and Sir Jonas Moore and completed the university education at Cambridge that had, as a teenager, been stalled. It was through his links with Moore, as well as his precise calculations concerning the stars and the moon, that Flamsteed was put in charge of the new Royal Observatory in Greenwich at the age of 29.

 

By 1675, Flamsteed was Astronomer Royal with a salary of £100 a year and lodging rooms within the observatory itself, built by Sir Christopher Wren. He worked incessantly. In 1683 he built a mural quadrant, privately instructed students on mathematics and astronomy and stared for long hours at the night sky. Between 1677 and 1689 he made 20,000 observations and in 1688 had an assistant to help him, called Abraham Sharp. Sharp also made instruments to assist Flamsteed in his observations and calculations, all which Flamsteed paid for, perhaps explaining why after his death, his widow hurried to the Observatory and took them all away.

 

In 1694 Sir Isaac Newton visited Flamsteed at the Observatory to discuss his recent theory of gravity and ask for help applying its findings to that of the moon. Newton calculated, while Flamsteed provided him with new observations. Newton urged his colleague to publish his findings on the stars, even though Flamsteed insisted his lists were not complete. They were eventually printed in 1707, although Flamsteed was not happy with them, considering them full of errors. By 1712 he was in ill-health, suffering from headaches and pain in the joints. In a letter, he wrote of finding himself so tired when travelling to church that he bought a sedan chair ‘and am carried thither in state on Sunday mornings and back’. He died on 31 December 1719 and was buried in Burstow Church in Surrey. He was 73 years old.

 

Not only had Flamsteed documented dozens of stars, made thousands of observations and assisted Newton with his work on gravity, he worked on the lunar cycles and the axis of the Sun. He worked at a time of great excitement in science and networked with some of the most well-known scientists and astronomers, and was known too to Charles II, William and Mary and Queen Anne. 


You might also like Oxford's Oldest Coffee Houses and How Charles II Dealt with the Plague Outbreak of 1665


Never want to miss a post? Subscribe to my newsletter here: 


 

Sources


Maunder, Edward Walter. The Royal Observatory, Greenwich; a glance at its history and work. The Religious Tract Society, London, 1900. 


Mary I, Queen of England, is often cast by historians and writers of period dramas as severe and serious, wearing dark colours and avoiding displays of excess. But the sources show a different woman who danced, wore costumes at masques and showed off a startling collection of jewels. 

An inventory of Mary's jewellery survives from her time as princess and it reveals something of her personality and tastes, along with her generosity to others and relationships within the court. Beginning in 1542, when Mary was around 26 years old, the inventory details items wrought in interesting shapes and with religious messages that may have resonated with her personally. Some are simply dazzling. The first item, a 'balas with one emerald, one ruby and one diamond crowned, with a great pearl pendant at the same, with three small stones on the backside' show the intricacy of Tudor jewellery and the skills of the craftsman that made them. A balas is a pink gemstone often likened to a ruby that was also favoured by her father Henry VIII earlier in his reign. There are a variety of other balas stones with ornaments and tablets. Another, 'one other balas set in a dolphin with one diamond table and a great pearl pendant at the same', shows more Tudor craftsmanship. 

Cropped image from Queen Mary blessing cramp rings. Oil painting by H. Hayman, 1916. Public Domain Mark. Source: Wellcome Collection. 

Mary also liked flowers, and had jewels set in the shape of various floral designs, some unsurprisingly featuring roses and rubies and pearls to mark the red and white of the Tudor Rose symbol. She also owned 'a flower with five great diamonds, two rubies, one emerald and a great pearl pendant', and another 'with five diamonds, one ruby in the midst and three pearls pendant at the same'. These 'three pearls pendant' bring to mind the famous necklace of Anne Boleyn, the 'B' with the three pearls dangling below it, showing that Mary owned something similar but representing a flower instead of an initial. In any case these jewels would have sparkled and shone in the candlelight of the Tudor court. 

She also owned a diamond cross set with pearls and with a pearl pendant which was given to her as a diplomatic gift by 'Duke Philipe', which Henry VIII requested she pass on to him, which she did. There were also gold chains in her possession, one with pearls and diamonds, along with brooches and tablets. Many of these had religious depictions, such as a 'brooch of gold of the History of Moses set with two little diamonds'. Others depicted St John the Evangelist, the History of Suzanne and the Story of Solomon, among others. One of these, a brooch of gold 'enamelled black with an agate, of the Story of Abraham with four small rubies' was given by the princess to Sir Anthony Browne as a gift after he drew her as his Valentine. An especially touching depiction is recorded in a 'book of gold with the king's face and her grace mother's' showing that even after Katherine of Aragon died, she kept her likeness to wear. She also owned a similar depiction in enamel of the king and his third wife, Jane Seymour. 

Some of these jewels Mary gifted to courtiers, but her half-sister and half-brother Elizabeth and Edward also received some. A 'pomander of gold with a dial in it' was gifted to Elizabeth, while Edward, while king, received a ring. After Mary became queen, she gifted Elizabeth on 21 September 1553 with 'a brooch of the history of Pyramus and Thisbe with a fair table diamond garnished with four rubies'. On the same day she also gave her a string of beads of white coral, trimmed with gold. The message behind Pyramus and Thisbe's love story may be significant. An ancient story later used by Shakespeare in modelling his play Romeo and Juliet, the tale revolves around a forbidden love between the children of two warring families and the eventual demise of both partners for love's sake. Is it possible that Mary gave Elizabeth the gift in recognition of her friendship (sometimes believed to have been more than this) with Robert Dudley, son of the disgraced Duke of Northumberland who Mary had executed just four weeks before she gave her sister the gift. The execution and the downfall of the Dudleys would have been fresh in Elizabeth's mind, and it's possible that, regardless of Mary's intention, she perceived the gift as a hidden message to be wary of involvement with the family. At the time, Robert Dudley was languishing in the Tower of London awaiting judgement. Mary was her father's daughter and suspicious of Elizabeth's influence and support, the timing of this gift being just right to give her sister a gentle and subtle warning to stay in line. She would imprison Elizabeth six months later after suspecting her plotting against her.

Other recipients of Mary's generosity included Margaret Lennox, Frances Brandon, Anne Seymour (Stanhope) and various courtiers to mark weddings. Mary also received some of her jewellery as gifts. Katherine Parr gave her a 'pair of bracelets of gold set with diamond and rubies and in either of them one emerald, given by the Queen's grace shortly after her marriage'. Katherine married Henry VIII in July 1543. 

She also owned girdles, which were secured around the waist, and habiliments, strips of jewels (often including pearls) which decorated the border of a headdress or neckline. Among some of the more unusual jewels owned by Mary included agate, crystal, coral and lapiz lazuli. One in particular, a string of lapiz lazuli beads trimmed with gold must have been especially eye-catching and colourful. 

The inventories end in July 1546, the year Mary turned thirty, and five months before the death of her father. Although I'm not aware that any other inventories of Mary's jewels survive for her later years, this one is fascinating as it demonstrates that Mary did in fact love jewels - something that was also remarked on later by an ambassador when she was queen - and was not the dowdy, frumpy princess of Tudor history. 

Like this? You might also like Mary I and Philip of Spain Visit Reading, Philip of Spain Arrives at Southampton in 1554 and Tudor Wedding Dresses. 

Interested in Tudor history? You might also like my second book, Power Couples of the Tudor Era, published by Pen and Sword Books, which explores the contributions couples made to their own times as well as how they influenced our own. Katherine of Aragon and Henry VIII as well as Mary I and Philip of Spain are explored in their own dedicated chapters. Order your copy here. 



Never want to miss a post? Subscribe to my newsletter here: 



Source: Privy Purse Expenses of the Princess Mary, Daughter of King Henry the Eighth and Afterwards Queen Mary. Frederick Madden. William Pickering, London. 1831. 


Older Posts Home


ABOUT ME

Passionate about history. Author and artist, in love with the history of what is now Britain, especially the period 1200-1750. Come and say hi!

SUBSCRIBE & FOLLOW

Books





POPULAR POSTS

  • What Really Made Henry VIII Obese?
  • 10 Everyday Objects From Tudor Times
  • The Princes in the Tower Mystery Will Probably Never Be Solved and Here's Why
  • Recipe for Marchpane
  • 10 Facts About King John's Tomb in Worcester Cathedral
  • Henry VIII's Tudor Cheeseboard
  • The Aldworth Giants at Aldworth Church, Berkshire
  • Why Was Henry VIII Obsessed With Producing a Male Heir?
  • 11 Foods The Tudors Never Knew
  • Henry VIII's Easter at Whitehall, 1539

Sketcherjoey Shop

Sketcherjoey Shop
Powered by Blogger
All content owned by (c) Jo Romero unless stated otherwise. Do not republish without permission

Amazon Associates

Jo Romero is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.co.uk. There are affiliate links on this blog, to help me fund my historic recipe development and general upkeep of the blog - if you click on them and decide to make a purchase, the price you pay will be no different, but I might receive a small commission that goes back into producing these recipes.
  • Home
  • Forgotten Women
  • Historic Recipes
  • PRIVACY

Distributed By Gooyaabi | Designed by OddThemes